Julian Jaynes

by Keith Purtell

It doesn’t matter whether or not the scientific community accepted the ideas in “The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind.” Constructing new dogma is not the goal of a good scientific treatise. Presenting new models and theories about our world is. Presenting supporting rationale and evidence is even better.

Julian Jaynes

Julian Jaynes

Jaynes turned archaeological sociology on its head when he proposed his stunning new explanation for the rise and fall of ancient cultures. Based on exhaustive research in multiple disciplines, Jaynes’ concept was that ancient cultures were centered around religious practice that included actually hearing the voices of their gods, which Jaynes asserts originated in their own brains. The premise was grounded in bedrock brain research, but it startled many readers.

“The Origin of Consciousness ...” is a far-ranging journey through human history. Jaynes is a patient old guide whose careful, rational voice coaxes the student through every turn of the road. The search for understanding rolls across centuries, past landmarks both physical and intangible. Like any good investigator, Jaynes is obsessed with the trail of evidence.

It really takes the entire book for the theory to become clear, but his cogent monologue grows increasingly convincing with each page. By the end of this book, Jaynes’ chugging logic has become a diesel locomotive. This must have been the farthest thing from catechism Jaynes’ peers could have expected in 1976.

Even if the auditory hallucination theory is rejected, Jaynes’ general concept about the growth and collapse of ancient cultures still holds together. Students of history know chaos is usually closer than cultures realize, because civilization is based on a complex web of shared agreements about how we will behave toward each other. In an ancient society built entirely on religious agreement, a rupture of faith would be, as Jaynes pointed out, a calamity.

Julian JaynesJulian Jaynes

There were comparisons with Sigmund Freud when this book came out. However, Freud’s work had more impact when it was publicized. Where scientific dogma was once brittle, it now carries the bureaucratic inertia of thousands of scientists interconnected in a complex network. Novel ideas are likely to be suffocated under a mass of entrenched attitudes. Among the less intransigent, “The Origin of Consciousness” stirred excitement.